Mortgage Rates In The First Week of 2008

Mortgage interest rates began the year at a 4-week low, according to Freddie Mac’s weekly survey of mortgage lenders. 30-year fixed-rate home loans averaged 6.07%, down from 6.17% last week. 15-year fixed-rate mortgages carried an interest rate of 5.68%, compared to 5.79% a week ago. 5-year adjustable mortgages dropped from 5.90% to 5.78%, and one-year ARMs were at 5.47%.

Analysts attribute the drop in interest rates to a series of bad news about the economy and pessimistic expectations about the new year. However, the consumer confidence report picked up in December for the first time in 5 months. I wonder if it’s all holiday cheer or a long-term trend. Either way, mortgage interest rates got even better, for those who can qualify for a loan.

Job Cuts At LendingTree

Mortgage lender LendingTree couldn’t think of a better holiday gift for its employees: job cuts. Unlike Freddie Mac, which took its employees to a party at Ritz-Carlton, LendingTree will be eliminating 220 jobs, which leaves it with some 1,000 employees. This is the third time this year that the company conducts mass layoffs. According to a spokeswoman for the lender, the layoffs were prompted by pessimistic forecasts for the industry. LendingTree posted a third-quarter loss of $5.6 million, compared to profits of $15.2 million a year earlier. The company saw its loan sales plunge due to lower demand by the secondary market, lower revenue per loan and the closing of fewer loans. Since the beginning of the credit crunch in the summer, profits have plunged for mortgage lenders as they tightened their lending standards to prevent future delinquencies and foreclosures. A report by the Labor Department showed that the Consumer Price Index rose 0.8% in October, the biggest jump since September 2005, which will negatively affect the consumers’ ability to make timely mortgage payments, meaning more trouble for lenders. I guess Christmas won’t be very jolly for some companies.

Fannie, Freddie: More Gloom Ahead

The CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-chartered financiers of mortgage loans, recently voiced concerns about the housing market’s future. Freddie Mac’s Richard Syron said his company will likely suffer another quarterly loss of about $2 billion, with credit losses totaling $10-12 billion. The worst is not over yet, however: he expects home prices to drop further before the market stabilizes. The company is in “hiring freeze” in order to control costs while it struggles with losses. Fannie Mae’s CEO Daniel Mudd expects 2008 to be “very tough”, with a gradual recovery in late 2009. He expects home prices to fall 12% by next year and hopes Fannie’s recent efforts to raise capital will be enough to help the company deal with the situation. As the housing slump unfolds, it turns out even the two GSEs are not immune to trouble. Both have slashed their dividends in recent weeks and issued stock to raise capital.

As The Year Ends

2007 is drawing to its end, and between holiday shopping and baking cookies, some are trying to analyze the housing market trends and forecast its future behavior. While predictions range from mildly gloomy to disastrous, the NAR produced an amusingly optimistic home sales forecast for 2008. After reducing their home sales forecasts for 9 straight months, they now revised their 2007 forecast upwards, to 5.67 million from 5.66 million. Chief economist Lawrence Yun said an optimistic job market report and the government’s help for troubled homeowners influenced the improved outlook. The group believes home sales will rise to 5.7 million in 2008. A Global Insight economist forecasts 4.7 million home sales in 2008.

Merrill Lynch predicts a gloomy 2008 for the U.S. economy with high energy prices, weak employment, tight credit and falling home prices. And by the way, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are introducing tougher requirements for mortgages they securitize.

Mozilo On Housing Reform

It seems the idea of “freezing” interest rates will be implemented after all, despite its flaws and the fact that it will only help a small number of borrowers. Perhaps top economists are spooked, but why do something that is certain to fail? Even Countrywide’s Mozilo noticed how bad the idea is. He said the better solution would be to raise the conforming loan limits and to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to keep more loans on their books – an idea rejected by the Bush administration recently. There may be some conflict of interest on Mozilo’s part, but his arguments are reasonable. Freezing interest rates will help some homeowners, but it will hurt lenders and investors, and leave the rest of the borrowers to struggle with increasing mortgage payments. He also noted that the industry needs clear lending standards that will create a sense of certainty and lure investors back into the housing sector, pumping liquidity and spurring mortgage lending (Bingo! But maybe we should leave the conforming loan limits alone, cos they’re pretty high right now anyway).

The worst may not be over yet for the mortgage industry: Banc of America and Fannie Mae both predicted significant home price drops in 2008. Fixing the interest rate on a small portion of mortgages will not prevent foreclosures, especially with borrowers willing to walk away from their “upside down” mortgages.

Fannie Mae Will Cut Dividend, Too

Fannie Mae announced that it will cut its quarterly dividend by 30% from 50 cents to 35 cents a share, beginning the first quarter of 2008. In an attempt to raise capital, the company is planning to issue $7 billion of non-convertible preferred stock this month. The announcement comes after similar moves by sister company Freddie Mac, which issued $6 billion in preferred shares last month. Demand for Freddie stock was 5 times greater than the total amount of stock issued, according to the mortgage giant. Freddie Mac posted a loss of $1,5 billion, and Fannie took a $2 billion hit in the third quarter.

Fannie Mae said its 2008 financial results will probably be disappointing, due to turmoil in the housing markets. Shares dropped 3% on the news. Analysts believe the two GSEs may face significant losses related to subprime and Alt-A securities in the months to come. Unlike many banks, Fannie and Freddie have so far avoided large writedowns, but they are not immune to losses.

Mortgage Rates Lowest In 2 Years

Interest on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages fell to 6.10% this week, the lowest level in 2007, and the lowest since the week of October 13, 2005, said Freddie Mac. 15-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 5.73%, down from 5.83% last week, which is the lowest since January 2006. I guess now is the perfect time to refinance a mortgage if you can find a lender, but that could be hard, unless you have a perfect credit record. 5-year adjustable-rate mortgages slid to 5.86% from 5.88% last week, not that spectacular but still lower. One-year adjustable mortgages were at 5.43%, up from 5.42% a week ago. Speaking about the housing sector, Freddie Mac’s chief economist Frank Nothaft noted that the “overall picture” looks “glum with no immediate relief in sight”. So it is indeed.

Conforming Loan Limit Unchanged In 2008

The conforming loan limit, currently $417,000, will remain unchanged in 2008, announced OFHEO director James B. Lockhart. OFHEO is the entity that regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-chartered guarantors of home mortgages. Any loans above the $417,000 limit are considered “jumbo” and cannot be guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, so lenders usually charge higher interest on them. This limit only applies to one-unit properties; multiple-unit properties have higher limits. Alaska, Hawaii, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands have higher upper limits than other states. The maximum conforming loan limit is determined by analyzing October-to-October change in the average house price, which has declined more than 3% this year. The maximum limit hasn’t changed for the last 2 years, and it probably won’t get revised upwards anytime soon. The latest NAR report says the inventory of single-family homes on the market is at the highest level in 22 years (10.8 months’ supply), which can only drive home prices down.

Freddie Mac Seeks To Raise Capital

Freddie Mac was all over the headlines this morning, as recent news revealed the mortgage giant’s weaknesses. It is believed that the company may have insufficient capital to cover potential home-loan losses and there’s talk that both GSEs may be insolvent at some point in the near future, should more mortgages go bad. Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s downgraded Freddie’s outlook to “negative” from “stable”, though its debt is still rated AAA. Fannie and Freddie are required to hold 30% more capital than the minimum for other companies, and Freddie Mac found itself short of money, so it is now issuing securities to raise capital. Currently the company has $600 million above the minimum reserve level, much less than its $1-2 billion comfort level. It revealed plans to sell $5 billion of preferred stock in the very near term, probably this week. If losses in the fourth quarter are comparable to those in the previous three months, the mortgage giant will need to raise even more capital. James Lockhart, the director of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s regulator, OFHEO (Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight), refused to suspend the extra capital requirement when asked to.

Mortgage Interest Rates At 6-month Low

Freddie Mac’s weekly survey of interest rates shows the 30-year mortgage dropped from 6.24% to 6.20% for this week, the lowest since mid-May. The low for this year was 6.14% in early March, and rates kept climbing pretty steadily for a while, reaching 6.73% back in July. This made many analysts think that interest on 30-year fixed home loans is about to go through the roof topping 7% by the end of the year. Turns out they didn’t foresee the August credit crunch and well, no one counted in the Fed rate cuts. I assume now it’s safe to say interest rates won’t be nearing 7% until the end of the year in any case. With all the mess in the housing market and the two GSEs in trouble as well, the Fed may yet cut again at its meeting on December 11^th – they’ve thrown the dollar stability out the window anyway, so why not prop up the Real Estate sector for a while. Furthermore, oil will most likely hit $100/barrel by the end of 2007, rate cut or not (it’s at $97-$98 right now and forecasters say it will keep growing) due mostly to the dollar’s weakness: China plans to “diversify” its reserves, and OPEC is considering pricing oil in another currency. It may all look like doom & gloom but this is reality. Financial innovation, anyone?

Will The Fed Cut Rates Again?

They may want the Wall Street to believe a rate cut is not imminent, but investors are already counting on a 0.25% cut. The central bank released its economic outlook, in which it projected slower growth in 2008, and, quite surprisingly, declining unemployment. The economic growth forecast was revised downwards from 2.5-2.75% to 1.8-2.5%. Meanwhile, turmoil in financial markets is in full swing, with the two largest mortgage financiers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae reporting higher-than expected quarterly losses.

Shares of Freddie Mac dropped more than 28% after the mortgage giant announced quarterly loss of $2 billion and said it has trouble meeting its capital minimum, which may prompt it to cut its dividend. The company also warned that deeper losses may be coming in the future. Consequently, Countrywide got downgraded by Fox-Pitt, Kelton analyst Howard Shapiro on fears that Freddie’s trouble may mean less financing for the mortgage lender. Countrywide promptly released a statement saying it has “ample liquidity”, but analysts have trouble believing this. So, the Fed may have to cut rates on December 11^th, especially if something big happens as a result of the current chaos. Inflation and the price of oil, however, are still pretty troublesome and if the latter hits $100, the chances for a rate cut are minimal. Time will show.

Fannie And Freddie Under Fire

It was announced earlier this week that New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in relation to accusations that the two mortgage giants had purchased loans based on inflated appraisals from Washington Mutual. According to Cuomo, WaMu pressured eAppraiseIT, an appraisal company, to inflate home values on thousands of loans which were later sold to Fannie and Freddie. Freddie Mac replied immediately saying it will cooperate with investigators. WaMu and eAppraseIT said they did not breach regulations. WaMu’s stock price dropped 17% on the news, to the lowest level in 20 years.

James Lockhart, director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the GSEs’ regulator, however, expressed disappointment with the subpoenas. In a letter to Cuomo, he said that Fannie and Freddie “have no economic incentive to knowingly purchase or guarantee mortgages with inflated appraisals”, and “you and your staff may not fully understand the differences between the mortgage-backed securities issued by the GSEs and those issued by other entities”. I can feel the rage.

Fannie and Freddie have operating rules in place, which say that if the loans they purchase are linked to inflated appraisals, the lender has to buy them back. Too bad for WaMu, it’s already suffering losses from failed subprime loans, so if it has to repurchase all the mortgages it sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, its financial situation could deteriorate further. For the time being, both companies are continuing to purchase WaMu mortgages.

Former Freddie Mac CEO Settles Dispute With OFHEO

The Government reached a settlement with Leland Brendsel, former CEO of Freddie Mac, who was involved in the mortgage giant’s accounting scandal back in 2003. Brendsel will have to pay a total of $16.5 million in fines and other costs, including giving back some of his salary and bonuses. The money will be used to assist homeowners facing foreclosure. Brendsel was ousted in 2003, when he was accused of creating a corporate culture that allowed earnings misstatements of $5 billion between 2000 and 2002. Four other former Freddie Mac executives settled charges by paying civil fines and restitution. In the future, Freddie Mac cannot hire Brendsel again without the permission of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO). According to Kevin Downey, the former CEO’s attorney, Brendsel and OFHEO “disagree strongly about what happened in the past at Freddie Mac”.

Countrywide and KB Home: the worst not over yet

During a panel discussion hosted by the Milken Institute, Countrywide’s CEO Angelo Mozilo and KB Home’s President Jeffrey Mezger talked about the housing market, the Fed’s policy and surplus inventories. The worst is not over yet, according to Mozilo, and Mezger believes “things are going to stay tough for quite some time” for KB Home. Both agreed that lifting loan limits for “conforming” mortgages would help the industry, because the current limit is below median prices in many areas. Non-conforming loans that cannot be purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac come at a higher price, which further diminishes affordability and exacerbates problems in the housing sector.

So if they see more trouble ahead, how come Countrywide promised to post profit in Q4?

GSEs may have their caps lifted early next year

OFHEO (the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight), the regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said that the investment caps may be removed altogether for the two GSEs if they establish timely and audited financial reporting. This news comes shortly after the caps were placed 2% higher for both companies, which translates into additional $20 billion or so in investments for each company.

Whether or not this move will be made depends on what and how the two mortgage giants report when they file their annual financial statements for 2007. “Current financials with no material weaknesses is a key test”, according to OFHEO director James Lockhart. He also said that, “there’s a reasonable chance” that the caps will be “changed significantly” if not lifted. The investment caps were initially placed after accounting scandals rocked both companies’ reputations and credibility.

After all the recent activity and the disappointing results of the Fed rate cut, I smell panic.

Regulators lift caps on Fannie and Freddie

Not so long ago, the Bush administration rejected a proposal to raise the limit on how much the two government-chartered enterprises can hold in their portfolios, but a new move by the OFHEO does exactly that. As of October 1, Freddie and Fannie can increase their mortgage portfolios by up to 2% annually, and the caps on both are now at $735 billion, compared to $727 billion for Fannie Mae and $724 billion for Freddie Mac until recently. This is much less than the 10% Fannie asked for, and the company didn’t fail to mention this in its statement: “the more effective response, given the extent of the market disruption, would be to raise our portfolio cap by at least 10 percent so that we can more fully address the ongoing turmoil”.

Christopher Dodd, Chairman of Senate Banking Committee, also criticized the move as “timid and inadequate”, but some analysts fear that lifting the caps on the two GSEs in unwise. Indeed, the Fed already did a lot by cutting the Fed Funds Rate by half a percent, essentially flooding the market with money, so allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase more loans would trigger another short-lived iteration of the housing bubble. Pulling at levers to find out what happens could be very costly right now, so why not leave the market to fix itself? The rate cut is quite a dangerous experiment already, watch how the economy behaves until the end of the year and then decide what to do next. Now that Fannie and Freddie got their caps lifted a little, I guess it’s best to leave them as they are for a while, because it may take months to see the results of this week’s actions.

It’s official: Lone Star wants to amend tender offer

Yesterday, Lone Star delivered a letter to Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co.’s Board of Directors, which essentially asked for a substantial price cut on the company. It is clear to anyone that Accredited is worth well below $15.10 a share, and its price is declining with each passing day. Therefore, the new price Loan Star is offering is $8.50, “a premium of 35% over the closing price of the Company Common Shares on August 30, 2007”, according to the letter. Still a good price I would say, especially knowing that Lone Star could simply walk away from the deal – leaving the $12 million break up fee behind and after lengthy court proceedings, that is.

And as I read reports on home prices, I can’t help wondering what’s going on. Not that a decline of 0.1% vs. an increase of 0.1% makes much difference, but the way they present data is quite confusing. OFHEO (the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, the regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) came up with a 0.1% increase in home prices in Q2, and growth of 3.2% year-over-year, the slowest in a decade. Naturally, OFHEO Director James Lockhart didn’t fail to mention that “significant price declines appear localized in areas with weak economies”, but I would say these numbers are too vague because of the way they’re calculated. An index compiled by Standard & Poor’s Corp. showed that home prices declined 3.2% from last year, how’s that for slow house appreciation. Naturally these indices are calculated in different ways and based on different sets of data, so it’s hard to compare, but they both paint similar pictures of the housing market: no more “easy money” and “rapid appreciation”, this is the bursting of the housing bubble (or so say the pessimists).

Bernanke comments on the mortgage crisis

On Aug. 27^th, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke sent a letter to Senator Charles Schumer, in which he said there’s no need to lift the caps on Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s portfolios. A similar opinion was expressed by OFHEO (Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight), the federal regulator of the two GSEs’, and President George Bush a couple of weeks ago when a suggestion to lift the portfolio limitations on Fannie and Freddie was rejected. Bernanke said that policy makers may encourage Fannie and Freddie to package more loans into securities and sell them to investors, as these actions are not constrained by the portfolio caps. Bernanke also said that the Fed is closely monitoring the financial markets and “is prepared to act as needed” to prevent bigger problems.

Bernanke suggested developing new mortgage products for low- and moderate-income borrowers that would not cause unexpected spikes in mortgage payments. Clearer explanation of loan terms would also be beneficial to potential borrowers. He also noted that reforming the FHA (Federal Housing Agency) might be helpful.

Analysts believe that these comments spell a high likelihood of a Fed rate cut on the next meeting Sept. 18. Another speech by Bernanke is scheduled for this Friday, and it may well shed some more light on what the Fed is about to do.

Credit panic and foreclosure bailouts

Brilliant “bright” ideas on how to prevent a looming financial crisis are raining from everywhere. Just in the past few days, the following proposals have been all over the news.

PIMCO’s Bill Gross urged the White House to bail out troubled home owners: “If we can bail out Chrysler, why can’t we support the American homeowner?” I would say that the Chrysler bailout wasn’t a very good idea either, but then the government had its own reasons for it. In my opinion, it would be totally unfair to pay for borrowers’ unsound financial decisions with other taxpayers’ money. According to this blog entry, it turns out Mr. Gross himself is heavily invested in mortgages and further foreclosures would sting him quite badly. So that’s why we need to bail out borrowers.

Another brilliant plan comes from presidential candidate Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn). What he suggests is, to allow the Federal Housing Administration (a.k.a. FHA) to refinance troubled loans. He believes that the FHA does not serve its purpose well and needs to be reformed is order to be able to help homeowners-to-be. Dodd suddenly appeared among those “concerned” about housing several months ago, and started criticizing the government and the existing system, proposing some rather dubious solutions. Dodd also supported the idea to lift the investment caps on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s portfolio, a move that would allow an inflow of financing on the market. The idea was rejected.

I really wish all these activists were this creative a couple of years ago and invented an economically sound way of “saving the economy”. Unfortunately, right now we are indeed facing serious problems that need to be solved, and every solution seems to have “unwanted side effects” for the economy, the dollar, or the average consumer. Every foreclosure is a particular family’s tragedy, but many of the loans defaulting now should have never been made, and those who were involved in the process only have themselves to blame. It is true that the entire business was infested with fraudulent activity, but in the end everyone had a choice. Sadly, greed often prevailed.

Meanwhile, the Fed has some “bright” ideas of its own. According to CNN Money.com, the central bank has temporarily exempted Citigroup and Bank of America from limitations on the amount of money they can lend. So this is more of the same – a move to artificially boost cash flow in a market that is essentially stagnant. Sounds good for a short-term solution, but in the end market forces should be allowed to play their part in the whole thing.

Regulators won’t lift investment limits for GSEs

Last week, Fannie Mae requested permission to increase its investment portfolio in order to help spur the slumping mortgage market. It is currently subject to a limitation of 727.2 billion on its portfolio. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, or OFHEO, said on Friday it will not lift the investment caps on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. President Bush said that allowing Fannie Mae to purchase more loans was out of the question for the moment. However, “requests for an increase in the portfolio caps” will be kept “under active consideration”, according to a statement by the OFHEO. Freddie Mac’s spokesman expressed disagreement with the OFHEO’s decision.

To prop up the financial system, the Fed injected $38 billion into the market on Friday in the biggest move since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Similar moves were made by other central banks last week, including those of Germany, Australia and Japan. Consequences of the turmoil in the U.S. financial system are turning up in unexpected places, as a consequence of the interrelations of various investment instruments traded all over the world.